Attribution of the author of a toot #2

New issue

Closed

opened 2019-06-10 09:48:10 +00:00 by b3yond · 4 comments

b3yond commented

2019-06-10 09:48:10 +00:00

Owner

Author: @b3yond Posted at: 17.10.2017 22:30

Currently, if a mastodon user posts a warning, the twitter bot posts "username@instance.tld: message".

We should replace this with a link to the user account instead.

Author: @b3yond Posted at: 17.10.2017 22:30 Currently, if a mastodon user posts a warning, the twitter bot posts "username@instance.tld: message". We should replace this with a link to the user account instead.

b3yond closed this issue

2019-06-10 09:48:10 +00:00

b3yond commented

2019-06-10 09:48:11 +00:00

Author

Owner

Author: @ng-0 Posted at: 07.01.2018 13:31

I think it would be better to reduce visible data.
On the admin side of the Federation works you will still see that Person X sent Message A to Bot Y.
So I think it should be configurable if "username@instance.tld: " appears at all, defaulting to OFF.

Author: @ng-0 Posted at: 07.01.2018 13:31 I think it would be better to reduce visible data. On the admin side of the Federation works you will still see that Person X sent Message A to Bot Y. So I think it should be configurable if "username@instance.tld: " appears at all, defaulting to OFF.

b3yond commented

2019-06-10 09:48:11 +00:00

Author

Owner

Author: @ng-0 Posted at: 07.01.2018 13:33

Legal liability is another thing, so you'd need some kind of link to a disclaimer note that the entity running the bot has no control over the people who are interacting with it, or even that botA@instanceA.tld != botA@instanceB.tld etc

Author: @ng-0 Posted at: 07.01.2018 13:33 Legal liability is another thing, so you'd need some kind of link to a disclaimer note that the entity running the bot has no control over the people who are interacting with it, or even that botA@instanceA.tld != botA@instanceB.tld etc

b3yond commented

2019-06-10 09:48:11 +00:00

Author

Owner

Author: @b3yond Posted at: 07.01.2018 15:32

Yeah, good idea.

We are just sitting in our hackerspace/living room and are thinking about a database design, for #3 :) as soon as we implemented that, we can track the authors in the database, but don't have to publish them. Could be useful if we want to block certain people for abusing the bot or for false positives (some Nazis may try to disrupt the concept).

Author: @b3yond Posted at: 07.01.2018 15:32 Yeah, good idea. We are just sitting in our hackerspace/living room and are thinking about a database design, for #3 :) as soon as we implemented that, we can track the authors in the database, but don't have to publish them. Could be useful if we want to block certain people for abusing the bot or for false positives (some Nazis may try to disrupt the concept).

b3yond commented

2019-06-10 09:48:11 +00:00

Author

Owner

Author: @b3yond Posted at: 26.03.2018 19:23

We don't show the name anymore when we bridge a report. As the original post is only boosted/retweeted yet, it is still possible to find out who reported. We will enable anonymous reports with #17.

Author: @b3yond Posted at: 26.03.2018 19:23 We don't show the name anymore when we bridge a report. As the original post is only boosted/retweeted yet, it is still possible to find out who reported. We will enable anonymous reports with #17.